- Correspondence
- Published:
Nature Biotechnology
(2025)Cite this article
Subjects
In reality, research projects grow through an evolutionary process. Variation — the substrate of evolution — is provided through the emergence of new questions and avenues of investigation. The research team must then choose which directions to pursue, a process akin to natural selection1. Along with this evolution at the macro-scale, a much more orderly process is required at the micro-scale. Within each step, thoughtful study design leads to robust experiments and analyses. This complementarity between evolution and design best encapsulates the process of discovery: in ‘night science’ we evolve ideas for the next step, while ‘day science’ tests them2.
A project’s evolutionary history is generally obscured in the resulting scientific publication. The publication’s function is to justify and communicate the project’s main results; it is not a historical account. Instead of recounting all of the project’s dried-up branches, publications zoom in on a single lineage in its evolution: the steps that led to the most interesting result (Fig. 1c). Publications typically describe the discovery as it ideally should have happened, reporting only the evidence relevant to the proposed claims3.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals
Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription
$29.99 /Â 30Â days
cancel any time
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$209.00 per year
only $17.42 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on SpringerLink
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
References
-
Simonton, D. K. Creat. Res. J. 35, 304–323 (2023).
ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
-
Yanai, I. & Lercher, M. Genome Biol. 20, 179 (2019).
ArticleÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂGoogle ScholarÂ
-
Howitt, S. M. & Wilson, A. N. EMBO Rep. 15, 481–484 (2014).
ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂGoogle ScholarÂ
-
DeYoung, C. G., Quilty, L. C. & Peterson, J. B. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 93, 880–896 (2007).
ArticleÂ
PubMedÂGoogle ScholarÂ
-
DeYoung, C. G. J. Res. Pers. 56, 33–58 (2015).
ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
-
Kaufman, J. C. & Sternberg, R. J. The Cambridge Handbook of Creativity (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2019).
-
Feist, G. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Rev. 2, 290–309 (1998).
ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂGoogle ScholarÂ
-
Feist, G. J., Reiter-Palmon, R. & Kaufman, J. C., eds. Cambridge Handbooks in Psychology: The Cambridge Handbook of Creativity and Personality Research (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2017).
-
Roberts, B. W. & Mroczek, D. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 17, 31–35 (2008).
ArticleÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂGoogle ScholarÂ
-
Dweck, C. S. Mindset: The New Psychology of Success (Random House, 2007).
-
King, S. On Writing: A Memoir of the Craft (Simon and Schuster, 2020).
-
Yanai, I. & Lercher, M. J. Nat. Biotechnol. 42, 18–19 (2024).
ArticleÂ
CASÂ
PubMedÂGoogle ScholarÂ
Download references
Acknowledgements
We thank Gustavo S. França for assistance with the figure and James C. Kaufmann, Judith Berman, Amir Mitchell and Yoav Gilad for critical comments.
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Yanai, I., Lercher, M.J. Openness guides discovery.
Nat Biotechnol (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-025-02635-7
Download citation
-
Published:
-
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-025-02635-7
